Texas

Texas hemp rules, with their status stated honestly.

Every entry below carries its citation, its source, its effective date, and — separately — where enforcement actually stands. Where the honest answer is "under review", the entry says that instead of guessing.

How each rule record is built

  1. Source and citation

    The text and the authority it came from.

  2. Effective date

    When the text takes or took effect.

  3. Enforcement and review

    What has been verified, kept separate from the date.

The fields stay separate because an effective date alone does not answer the enforcement or litigation question.

Scope: Texas physical and online retail of consumable hemp products.

Snapshot last reviewed 2026-08-26 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending

This page is reviewed reference material, not legal advice. HempDash is not a law firm and does not issue compliance verdicts; decisions about your products belong with you and your counsel.

Texas Compliance Center

Start with the question in front of you

Each resource points back to the same reviewed rule snapshot below. Pending facts keep their caveats, and pages with an evidence gap say what they cannot establish.

COATexas COA requirementsA source-first view of the reviewed Texas record for certificate-of-analysis content, including what remains unverified.POTENCYTexas total delta-9 THC threshold statusThe effective-date, enforcement, and litigation fields for the Texas total delta-9 THC threshold, kept separate rather than collapsed into one verdict.LABELINGTexas hemp label requirements: evidence statusA governed entry point for label research that shows the current source boundary instead of inventing an unreviewed checklist.COACOA expiration and review datesA source-bound resource for separating a document date from any legal validity or product-lot conclusion.COACOA lot and batch matchingA practical evidence map for keeping product identity, lot or batch identity, and the laboratory record connected.INSPECTIONTexas DSHS inspection readinessA records-first route into the reviewed Texas rule snapshot, with operational preparation kept separate from legal requirements.ENFORCEMENTReceived a DSHS notice of violation?A careful records-and-escalation starting point that does not substitute automated output for qualified legal or regulatory advice.CORRECTIVE ACTIONCorrective-action documentationA recordkeeping framework for documenting an evidence gap, the decision made, the supporting material, and the follow-up.ONLINE RETAILOnline hemp retailer requirements in TexasThe reviewed registration record for online sellers serving Texas consumers, with source, date, and review caveats intact.REGISTRATIONTexas hemp retail registration and feesThe current reviewed registration record, including the fee detail that remains pending confirmation against the adopted schedule.PRODUCT RESTRICTIONSmokable hemp provisions in TexasA source-first record that acknowledges the provisions without publishing an unverified summary of their scope.PRODUCT RESTRICTIONDelta-8 status in TexasThe reviewed scheduling and litigation record, preserving the difference between an effective action and its application to a particular product.ENFORCEMENTTexas SB 3 statusA correction page for a common source of confusion: the 2025 bill is kept in historical—not active—status.

The rule records

Grouped by how each record reads today. Select an entry to see its full detail — citation, source, dates, enforcement posture, litigation, and what our review has not yet confirmed.

Active

In effect, with no stay or injunction identified in this review.

COA content requirements for consumable hemp products25 TAC §300.301(d) (adopted rules, 25 TAC Chapter 300)Active

The adopted DSHS rules set out the required contents of a certificate of analysis for consumable hemp products as a condition of sale in Texas. Section 300.301(d) names twelve fields, among them laboratory identification and contact information, sample and lot identification, analytical methods and instrumentation with limits of detection and quantitation, an expiration date, measurement of uncertainty analysis parameters, a QR code verifying the authenticity of testing at an accredited laboratory, and results reporting delta-9 THC, total delta-9 THC, and total THC per container.

Citation
25 TAC §300.301(d) (adopted rules, 25 TAC Chapter 300)
Effective
In effect — March 31, 2026, adopted DSHS rules filed with the Secretary of State March 2, 2026 (TRD-202601066).
Enforcement
In force — No stay or injunction against the COA content requirements as such was identified in this review. The total delta-9 THC threshold is recorded separately below because its posture is different; §300.301(d) is the certificate-of-analysis field set and carries no threshold of its own.
Last reviewed
2026-08-16 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending
Pending verification
The required-field list was verified 2026-08-16 against two independent official publications — the DSHS adopted-rule text and the Texas Register adoption notice (TRD-202601066) — which agree that §300.301(d) names twelve fields. The earlier conflicting counts came from third-party summaries rather than the adopted text, and the count is therefore no longer withheld. The HempDash compliance team ratified the interpretation 2026-08-17: the twelve-field list is complete with no incorporated-by-reference additions, and the §300.303(h) analyte list is separate (receipt kv-receipt-2026-08-17-coa-q4). Open questions this record asserts in neither direction: the total delta-9 THC computation method (Q1) and present enforcement posture.
Retail registration for consumable hemp product sellers25 TAC Chapter 300 (registration provisions); Texas Health & Safety Code ch. 443Active

The adopted rules require retailers of consumable hemp products to register with DSHS, with a registration fee of $5,000 per retail location under the adopted fee provisions.

Citation
25 TAC Chapter 300 (registration provisions); Texas Health & Safety Code ch. 443
Effective
In effect — March 31, 2026 (adopted DSHS rules).
Enforcement
In force — No stay or injunction against the registration requirement was identified in this review.
Last reviewed
2026-08-14 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending
Pending verification
The $5,000-per-location fee figure is pending confirmation against the adopted fee schedule text.
Registration of online retailers selling into Texas25 TAC Chapter 300 (registration provisions)Active

The adopted rules explicitly extend retail registration to online retailers selling consumable hemp products to Texas consumers — selling into Texas from outside the state does not place a seller outside the registration requirement.

Citation
25 TAC Chapter 300 (registration provisions)
Effective
In effect — March 31, 2026 (adopted DSHS rules).
Enforcement
In force — No stay or injunction against the online-retailer registration provision was identified in this review.
Last reviewed
2026-08-14 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending
Smokable hemp product provisions25 TAC Chapter 300 (smokable hemp provisions); Texas Health & Safety Code ch. 443Active

The adopted rules carry provisions specific to smokable hemp products. This record states that the provisions exist and are in effect; it does not summarize their scope, because that summary has not been verified against the rule text.

Citation
25 TAC Chapter 300 (smokable hemp provisions); Texas Health & Safety Code ch. 443
Effective
In effect — March 31, 2026 (adopted DSHS rules).
Enforcement
In force — No stay or injunction against the smokable hemp provisions was identified in this review.
Last reviewed
2026-08-14 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending
Pending verification
The scope of the smokable hemp provisions — and how they interact with earlier smokable-hemp litigation history — is pending counsel verification. The provisions' substance is deliberately not summarized until then.
21+ age restriction for consumable hemp product salesExecutive Order GA-56 (2025); 25 TAC Chapter 300Active

Sales of consumable hemp products in Texas are restricted to purchasers 21 and over, grounded in Executive Order GA-56 (2025) and carried into the adopted Chapter 300 rules.

Citation
Executive Order GA-56 (2025); 25 TAC Chapter 300
Effective
In effect — GA-56 issued October 2025; the Chapter 300 age provisions took effect with the adopted rules on March 31, 2026.
Enforcement
In force — No stay or injunction against the age restriction was identified in this review.
Last reviewed
2026-08-14 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending
Pending verification
Deep link to the GA-56 order text is pending; the source URL is the issuing office's site.
Controlled-substance scheduling of manufactured and synthesized cannabinoids51 TexReg 4597 (published 2026-07-10)Active

A Texas controlled-substances scheduling change places manufactured and synthesized cannabinoids on the state schedules, published in the Texas Register at 51 TexReg 4597 on July 10, 2026 and effective July 31, 2026.

Citation
51 TexReg 4597 (published 2026-07-10)
Effective
In effect — July 31, 2026.
Enforcement
In force — No stay or injunction against the scheduling action was identified in this review. DSHS states on its Consumable Hemp Program page that consumable hemp products "labeled to contain delta-8 THC or shown to contain more than trace amounts of tetrahydrocannabinols, including delta-8 THC, may be detained and referred to law enforcement" (read 2026-08-26). That is the agency's statement of what it may do; it is not a determination that any particular product is unlawful. Which specific products and processes fall within "manufactured" or "synthesized" is a scope question — see the delta-8 record below.
Litigation
Federal challenge: an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order was reported DENIED 2026-08-10 (S.D. Tex., Galveston Division), on the stated ground that plaintiffs had not sufficiently demonstrated irreparable harm; the request for a preliminary injunction was reported still pending. Reported by multiple independent press outlets; the docket was NOT read and the case number is not yet confirmed. State challenge: the temporary injunction was lifted 2026-06-05 by the Fifteenth Court of Appeals at the State's request, and the interlocutory appeal continues — see the total delta-9 THC threshold record below.
Last reviewed
2026-08-26 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending
Pending verification
Deep link to the 51 TexReg 4597 issue is pending; the source URL is the Texas Register index.

Scheduled

Signed or adopted with a future effective date. Not in force today.

Federal hemp redefinition — total THC basisP.L. 119-37 §781 (signed 2025-11-12)Scheduled

P.L. 119-37 §781 redefines hemp federally on a total-THC basis, so that THCA and other THC values count toward the limit rather than delta-9 THC alone. Signed November 12, 2025; effective November 12, 2026. This is a scheduled future requirement, not a rule in force today.

Citation
P.L. 119-37 §781 (signed 2025-11-12)
Effective
Scheduled — effective November 12, 2026. Not in effect today.
Enforcement
Not yet in force — Nothing about this provision is enforceable before its effective date. It is recorded here so operators can prepare, not because it binds anyone today.
Last reviewed
2026-08-14 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending
0.4 mg total THC per container cap on finished productsP.L. 119-37 §781 (signed 2025-11-12)Scheduled

P.L. 119-37 §781 caps finished consumable products at 0.4 mg total THC per container. Signed November 12, 2025; effective November 12, 2026. This is a scheduled future requirement, not a rule in force today.

Citation
P.L. 119-37 §781 (signed 2025-11-12)
Effective
Scheduled — effective November 12, 2026. Not in effect today.
Enforcement
Not yet in force — Nothing about this provision is enforceable before its effective date. Container-level total-THC content is the number to know before then.
Last reviewed
2026-08-14 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending
Synthesized-cannabinoid exclusion from the federal hemp definitionP.L. 119-37 §781 (signed 2025-11-12)Scheduled

P.L. 119-37 §781 excludes synthesized cannabinoids from the federal hemp definition. Signed November 12, 2025; effective November 12, 2026. This is a scheduled future requirement, not a rule in force today.

Citation
P.L. 119-37 §781 (signed 2025-11-12)
Effective
Scheduled — effective November 12, 2026. Not in effect today.
Enforcement
Not yet in force — Nothing about this provision is enforceable before its effective date. Whether a given ingredient is "synthesized" within the provision's meaning is a product-specific question for counsel.
Last reviewed
2026-08-14 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending

Under review

The text and its enforceability are not the same question right now. These entries state the verified facts and what is still being verified.

Total delta-9 THC threshold — 25 TAC §300.301(a)(4), §300.301(b)(4), §300.302(b)(1)25 TAC §300.301(a)(3)-(4), §300.301(b)(2), (b)(4); 25 TAC §300.302(b)(1), (c)(3)Under review

The adopted rules set the consumable hemp product threshold at a total delta-9 THC concentration of 0.3% or less on a dry weight basis. Texas requires three separate measures to be tested and reported — delta-9 THC, total delta-9 THC, and total THC (§300.301(a)(3), (b)(2)) — and the threshold binds to total delta-9 THC, which is neither delta-9 alone nor total THC. A sample also meets the threshold where the accredited laboratory's measurement of uncertainty produces a distribution or range that includes a result of 0.3% or less. The threshold's effective date and its present enforceability are separate questions, answered separately in this record.

Citation
25 TAC §300.301(a)(3)-(4), §300.301(b)(2), (b)(4); 25 TAC §300.302(b)(1), (c)(3)
Effective
Effective March 31, 2026 — adopted DSHS rules, filed with the Secretary of State March 2, 2026 (TRD-202601066).
Enforcement
Under review — The calculation basis is settled by the rule text and is no longer the open question; what remains open is whether the threshold is presently being enforced. Litigation posture changed in June 2026 and remains under verification. This page does not state that the threshold is currently being enforced, and does not state that it is not; the verified facts are the threshold text and effective date above and the litigation history below.
Litigation
THBC v. DSHS — Travis Co. temporary injunction reported dissolved 2026-06-05 by the Fifteenth Court of Appeals; interlocutory appeal continues. Re-checked 2026-08-26 against the plaintiff-side trade organization's own public account, which CORROBORATES the 2026-06-05 lift (at the State's request) and supplies a case number for the interlocutory appeal, No. 15-26-00099-CV, with a plaintiff brief filed 2026-08-14. That source is PARTY-ADJACENT — a party's account of its own litigation — and the appellate record was not read. Separate federal litigation: a temporary restraining order was reported denied 2026-08-10 with a preliminary injunction still pending (see the scheduling record above). NOTE that secondary coverage frequently conflates this case with the separate Sky Marketing delta-8 matter; the Texas Supreme Court ruling reported in May 2026 was in Sky Marketing, not here.
Last reviewed
2026-08-26 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending
Pending verification
Verified 2026-08-16 against two independent official publications (the DSHS adopted-rule text and the Texas Register adoption notice, TRD-202601066): the threshold binds to total delta-9 THC, the 0.3% boundary is inclusive, and the measurement-of-uncertainty allowance is part of the rule. Those are recorded above as settled fact. The HempDash compliance team resolved the open computation question 2026-08-17: total delta-9 THC is computed as delta-9 THC plus 0.877 times THCA, and per §300.301(d)(12) all three tested values — delta-9 THC, total delta-9 THC, and total THC per container — are required on a conforming COA (receipt kv-receipt-2026-08-17-q1-method). One question remains open and is asserted in neither direction here: the present enforcement and litigation posture.
Delta-8 THC products in Texas51 TexReg 4597 (published 2026-07-10, effective 2026-07-31); prior contested historyUnder review

The legal position of delta-8 THC products in Texas has a contested, unsettled history spanning agency action and litigation since 2021. The July 31, 2026 scheduling of manufactured and synthesized cannabinoids (51 TexReg 4597) bears on delta-8 products to the extent they are produced by synthesis or conversion — a scope question this record does not decide.

Citation
51 TexReg 4597 (published 2026-07-10, effective 2026-07-31); prior contested history
Effective
The scheduling action is in effect as of July 31, 2026. How it applies to any particular delta-8 product depends on how that product is made.
Enforcement
Under review — Whether and how the scheduling action is being enforced against specific delta-8 product categories has not been verified in this review. DSHS states on its Consumable Hemp Program page that "[o]nly trace amounts of delta-8 THC naturally produced by the hemp plant from which the consumable hemp product was manufactured are permissible" and that products labeled to contain delta-8 THC, or shown to contain more than trace amounts, "may be detained and referred to law enforcement" (read 2026-08-26). That is the agency's published position on its own authority, not a determination about any particular product.
Litigation
The pre-2026 delta-8 dispute history (agency scheduling attempts and the resulting injunction litigation from 2021 onward) is part of the record but is not summarized here pending counsel verification of its current state.
Last reviewed
2026-08-26 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending
Pending verification
Counsel verification pending on: (1) which delta-8 production methods fall within the scheduled definitions, and (2) the current state of the earlier delta-8 litigation. The 2026-08-26 pass identified the thread question (2) turns on: the separate Sky Marketing matter, in which the Texas Supreme Court was reported to have ruled in DSHS's favor in May 2026 on delta-8 scheduling. That matter was NOT read and is not summarized here. Secondary coverage routinely conflates it with THBC v. DSHS, so it is named explicitly to keep the two apart.

Historical

Never took effect, or no longer does. Recorded because they are still commonly mistaken for current law.

SB 3 (89th Legislature, 2025) — vetoed, never lawSB 3, 89th Legislature, Regular Session (2025); vetoed 2025-06-22Historical

Senate Bill 3 of the 89th Regular Session, which would have imposed broad restrictions on consumable hemp products, was vetoed by the Governor on June 22, 2025. It never took effect and imposes no requirement on any operator. It appears here because it is still widely — and wrongly — described as current law.

Citation
SB 3, 89th Legislature, Regular Session (2025); vetoed 2025-06-22
Effective
Never took effect — vetoed June 22, 2025.
Enforcement
Not applicable — A vetoed bill is not law and is not enforced.
Last reviewed
2026-08-14 · HempDash compliance research — primary-source verification pending

What changed, and when

The dated sequence behind the statuses above. Dates are the verified anchor; everything else on this page hangs off them.

How to read the status map

Event labels say what happened on a date. Status labels show how the related records are grouped on this page. Neither replaces the separate effective, enforcement, and litigation fields in each record.

Active
In effect, with no stay or injunction identified in this review.
Scheduled
Signed or adopted with a future effective date. Not in force today.
Under review
The text and its enforceability are not the same question right now. These entries state the verified facts and what is still being verified.
  1. Effective-date event

    Adopted DSHS rules take effect

    25 TAC Chapter 300 — COA requirements, licensing and registration (including online retailers selling into Texas), smokable hemp provisions, and the 21+ age provisions — takes effect.

    ActiveUnder review
  2. Litigation event

    Injunction dissolution reported in THBC v. DSHS

    The Fifteenth Court of Appeals is reported to have dissolved the Travis County temporary injunction bearing on the Texas total delta-9 THC threshold; the interlocutory appeal continues, and that threshold's enforcement posture is under review on this page as a result.

    Under review
  3. Effective-date event

    Texas scheduling change takes effect

    The controlled-substances scheduling of manufactured and synthesized cannabinoids (51 TexReg 4597, published July 10, 2026) takes effect.

    ActiveUnder review
  4. Future effective date

    Federal hemp redefinition scheduled to take effect

    P.L. 119-37 §781 — the total-THC federal hemp redefinition, the 0.4 mg total THC per container cap, and the synthesized-cannabinoid exclusion — is scheduled to take effect. A future requirement until that date.

    Scheduled
A single date can connect to records with different postures. Open the related rule records above for the effective, enforcement, and litigation details that produce each status.

Effective, enforced, litigated — three different questions

"Effective" means the text has legally taken effect on its stated date. That is a fact about the rule, and it is usually easy to verify.

"Enforced" is a different question: whether the agency is actually holding operators to the rule right now. A rule can be effective and paused, effective and contested, or effective and enforced. An effective date never answers the enforcement question by itself, and this page never treats it as if it did.

Litigation is the third question. A court order can suspend enforcement of an effective rule, and a later order can undo that suspension — which is exactly the sequence reported around the Texas total delta-9 THC threshold in 2026. When the courts are mid-motion, the honest posture is the one this page shows: state the verified dates and orders, mark enforcement as under review, and say what is still being verified.

That is why every record above carries the three fields separately. When you see "Under review" on this page, it means our review has verified the dates but not the present enforcement posture — not that the rule is safe to ignore, and not that it is being enforced.

Inspection-readiness checklist

Operational practice for keeping records retrievable — the habit that makes any inspection shorter. Items marked with a citation restate a requirement from the records above; the rest are practice, not law.

  • A current certificate of analysis on file for every consumable hemp product on the shelf, matched to the batch you are actually selling.

    Restates: 25 TAC §300.301

  • Your DSHS retail registration certificate, current and retrievable for each location — including online sales channels selling into Texas.

    Restates: 25 TAC Chapter 300

  • A written record of your 21+ age-check practice at the point of sale.

    Restates: Executive Order GA-56 (2025); 25 TAC Chapter 300

  • Purchase and supplier records that connect each product on the shelf to where it came from.

    Operational practice — not a legal requirement

  • Label files for current products, kept with the COA for the same batch.

    Operational practice — not a legal requirement

  • A dated note of when you last reviewed this page or your own rule summary, so "what did you know and when" has an answer.

    Operational practice — not a legal requirement

The cited items restate requirements from the records above. The uncited items are operational practice we consider sensible — they are not legal requirements, and nothing on this list is a substitute for counsel.

Get verified rule changes by email

When a record on this page changes after review, we write an update and send it — a person, on a review cycle, not an automated feed. Low volume: if nothing verified changed, nothing is sent.

Preparing for November 12, 2026?

The scheduled federal provisions above have their own page — what changes, which product categories the provisions touch, and the evidence worth collecting now.

See the November 12 page