← All lessons

Lesson 10 of 10 · 8 minute read

Receiving Products From Vendors

The operational intake lesson: what a Texas hemp retailer checks before a delivery goes from the back door to the shelf — the vendor, the paperwork, the COA, the label, and the packaging — and what to do when something doesn't clear.

Jurisdiction: Texas · Last reviewed August 9, 2026

Quick answers

What should a retailer check before accepting hemp products?

Before shelving a delivery, a Texas consumable hemp retailer should verify the supplier's credentials, tie every item to a lot number, and run a per-lot COA check: the COA is complete and unexpired, its product name, matrix, lot number, and manufacturer match the physical product, and the results clear. Then spot-check the label's required elements and warnings and confirm the packaging is tamper-evident and child resistant. Texas law prohibits introducing nonconforming hemp-derived cannabinoids into commerce (25 TAC §300.602(1)), so the receiving bench is where compliance is decided.

25 TAC §300.602(1) · Texas · Reviewed August 9, 2026 · HempDash guidance

Do hemp manufacturers and distributors need a license in Texas?

Yes. A person must hold a consumable hemp products license issued by DSHS before manufacturing or processing consumable hemp products, and must hold a wholesaler license under Texas Health and Safety Code Chapter 431 before distributing them (25 TAC §300.201(a)). A distributor — someone who distributes consumable hemp products for resale — is expressly required to hold the wholesaler license (§300.101(16)).

25 TAC §300.201(a); §300.101(16) · Texas · Reviewed August 9, 2026 · Regulation

How can I verify a hemp supplier's license in Texas?

DSHS publishes a public "Current Licensees and Registrants" resource for the Consumable Hemp Program: downloadable lists of Consumable Hemp Product licensees and Retail Hemp Registrations, plus an online search tool to verify that an establishment has a current license or registration — searchable by name, license type, city, or county, with no login required.

DSHS Consumable Hemp Program, Current Licensees and Registrants (public lookup) · Texas · Reviewed August 9, 2026 · HempDash guidance

Is a Texas retailer legally required to verify its supplier's license?

We found no provision in 25 TAC Chapter 300 that requires a retailer to verify a supplier's license before buying — the supplier-documentation record duties in the rule sit on manufacturers and processors (§300.203(d)(3)). But nonconforming product in your store is your problem: introducing it into commerce is prohibited, and the product faces detention, embargo, and destruction. Checking the free DSHS lookup is cheap insurance.

25 TAC §300.203(d)(3); §300.602(1) (no retailer verification duty appears in 25 TAC Chapter 300) · Texas · Reviewed August 9, 2026 · Regulation

Can a Texas store sell hemp products made in another state?

Yes, with conditions. A person selling consumable hemp products in Texas that were processed or manufactured outside Texas must comply with Chapter 300 and, on DSHS's request, submit evidence of compliant out-of-state manufacture — under a USDA-approved plan, the applicable USDA plan, or foreign law plus Texas-compliant testing (25 TAC §300.403). That evidence duty sits on the Texas seller, so collect it from the vendor at onboarding.

25 TAC §300.403 · Texas · Reviewed August 9, 2026 · Regulation

What if a product's COA is expired when the delivery arrives?

Under 25 TAC §300.301(f), expired COAs are not valid and products with expired COAs must be retested. At receiving, that means the lot doesn't go on the shelf until a current, matching COA exists. The rule doesn't say who arranges or pays for the retest — settle that in your supplier agreements with counsel before it comes up.

25 TAC §300.301(f) · Texas · Reviewed August 9, 2026 · Regulation

What has to match between a COA and the product?

At intake, check that the product name, matrix type (flower, edible, tincture), lot number, and manufacturer name and address on the COA match the physical product — and scan the QR code to confirm it resolves to this same COA at the laboratory. A COA belongs to one lot; a different lot's COA is a different product's paperwork.

Practice built on 25 TAC §300.301(d) · Texas · Reviewed August 9, 2026 · HempDash guidance

What packaging rules apply when a hemp product is sold in Texas?

Before selling or distributing, the product must be prepackaged — or placed at the time of sale — in packaging that is tamper-evident, child resistant, and, if it holds multiple servings or products, resealable while keeping the child-resistant mechanism intact (25 TAC §300.405). Because the duty applies at the time of sale, it lands on the retailer — which is why packaging is a receiving check, not an afterthought.

25 TAC §300.405 · Texas · Reviewed August 9, 2026 · Regulation

What label items should receiving staff spot-check?

On the outer packaging of each unit: batch (lot) number, batch date, product name, manufacturer or processor name, their phone and email, the COA URL, and serving size in milligrams with servings per container (25 TAC §300.402(a)); the statute adds a certification that delta-9 THC is not more than 0.3% (HSC §443.205(a)(6)). The five required warnings must appear, and the COA URL must be conspicuously marked and reach the COA in three or fewer steps — test it on one unit per lot.

25 TAC §300.402(a); Tex. HSC §443.205(a)(6) · Texas · Reviewed August 9, 2026 · Regulation

What should a retailer do when a delivery fails an intake check?

As operating practice (Texas rules prescribe no retail rejection procedure): don't shelve it; segregate the affected lot from sellable stock; notify the vendor in writing the same day with what failed and what you need; log the date, lot, failure, and resolution; and return or refuse the delivery if the vendor can't cure it. The decision rule: no matching, current, verifiable COA — the product doesn't go on the shelf.

Operating practice; no retail rejection procedure appears in 25 TAC Chapter 300 · Texas · Reviewed August 9, 2026 · HempDash guidance

Can a hemp vendor sell me other companies' products?

Under Texas's definitions, manufacturers may only distribute products they manufactured (25 TAC §300.101(24)); a person who distributes consumable hemp products for resale is a distributor and must hold an HSC Chapter 431 wholesaler license (§300.101(16)). If a vendor carries multiple brands, ask the wholesaler-license question in writing.

25 TAC §300.101(24), (16) · Texas · Reviewed August 9, 2026 · Regulation

How long should COAs and test results be kept?

Test results must be retained for at least three years from the date results are received (25 TAC §300.303(f)), and records described in Chapter 300 carry a three-year minimum generally (§300.203(c)). Filing each COA at intake, retrievable by lot number, is what makes that possible.

25 TAC §300.303(f); §300.203(c) · Texas · Reviewed August 9, 2026 · Regulation

What you'll learn

  • Know who in your supply chain needs which Texas credential — and how to check a supplier against DSHS's public licensee list before the first order
  • Run the COA Intake Checklist on every delivery, one lot at a time
  • Spot-check the label's required elements and warnings at receiving, before shelving
  • Verify the packaging duties that sit on you at the time of sale
  • Handle out-of-state product, incomplete paperwork, and rejections without guessing where the rules are silent

Listen to this lesson

A word-for-word narration of the reviewed lesson (17:06).

Read the transcript
You're listening to HempDash Academy — practical compliance education for hemp retailers. Today's lesson: Receiving Products From Vendors. The operational intake lesson: what a Texas hemp retailer checks before a delivery goes from the back door to the shelf — the vendor, the paperwork, the COA, the label, and the packaging — and what to do when something doesn't clear. In this lesson, you will learn: Know who in your supply chain needs which Texas credential — and how to check a supplier against DSHS's public licensee list before the first order. Run the COA Intake Checklist on every delivery, one lot at a time. Spot-check the label's required elements and warnings at receiving, before shelving. Verify the packaging duties that sit on you at the time of sale. Handle out-of-state product, incomplete paperwork, and rejections without guessing where the rules are silent. Receiving is where compliance is decided. Almost every retail compliance duty in this course — valid COA, compliant label, child-resistant packaging, nothing misleading, nothing nonconforming — is easiest to satisfy at one moment: when the box arrives and before anything is shelved. Once a product is on the shelf, you are selling it; and Texas law prohibits 'introducing hemp-derived cannabinoids into commerce that do not conform to the provisions of this chapter' — and prohibits causing that, too (25 TAC §300.602(1)). This lesson turns the rules you've already learned into a receiving routine. It works down the same stages as the COA Intake Checklist — document intake, identity matching, results review, file and decide — and adds the receiving-specific layer around it: is this vendor legitimate, is the shipment what the invoice says, and what do you do when something doesn't clear? Before the first order: know who you're buying from. Texas splits the supply chain into credentials. A person must hold a consumable hemp products license issued by DSHS before manufacturing or processing consumable hemp products, and must hold a wholesaler license under Health and Safety Code Chapter 431 before distributing them (25 TAC §300.201(a)). A 'distributor' — someone who distributes consumable hemp products for resale — is expressly required to hold that wholesaler license (§300.101(16)). And one structural detail worth knowing: manufacturers may only distribute products they manufactured (§300.101(24)) — so a 'vendor' offering you five other brands alongside their own may be acting as a distributor, and the wholesaler-license question applies. Here's the honest part: we found no provision in Chapter 300 that requires a retailer to verify a supplier's license before buying. The supplier-documentation record duties in the rule (§300.203(d)(3)) sit on manufacturers and processors, not on you. But 'not required to check' is not the same as 'safe not to check' — if nonconforming product crosses your counter, §300.602(1) and the detention, embargo, and destruction machinery (§§300.603–300.604) land on the product in your store, and the cost and disruption land on you. The check is cheap, because DSHS makes it public. The Consumable Hemp Program's 'Current Licensees and Registrants' page publishes downloadable lists of Consumable Hemp Product licensees and Retail Hemp Registrations, plus an online search tool: 'Verify that an establishment has a current license or registration with DSHS. Search by name, license type, city or county.' No login is needed. Before onboarding a Texas manufacturer, look them up; keep a dated screenshot or the row from the list in your vendor file. If a Texas manufacturer isn't on DSHS's list, ask them why before you buy — don't assume the list is stale in their favor. Out-of-state product: the rule, and its limits. Out-of-state product is legal to sell in Texas — with strings. A person selling consumable hemp products in Texas that were processed or manufactured outside Texas must comply with Chapter 300, and must, on DSHS's request, submit evidence that the products were manufactured in another state or foreign jurisdiction in compliance with a USDA-approved plan, the USDA plan under 7 U.S.C. §1639q, or (for foreign products) laws plus Texas-compliant testing (25 TAC §300.403). Read that carefully: the duty to produce that evidence sits on the person selling in Texas — you. At receiving, that means asking the out-of-state vendor for their state license or plan documentation up front, because DSHS asks you, not them. A related transport rule: substances with total delta-9 THC above the acceptable hemp THC level may not be transported into Texas for further processing (§300.404). That provision is aimed at processing inputs rather than retail stock, but it's part of why an over-threshold COA on an inbound shipment is a full stop, not a judgment call. Where the rules go quiet, stay closed. One piece has since been answered in agency guidance: DSHS now states a Retail Hemp Registration is required for sellers who retail consumable hemp products online without a storefront. Chapter 300 still doesn't clearly address out-of-state sellers shipping into Texas or online marketplaces, and an out-of-state vendor won't appear on DSHS's Texas licensee list — that absence proves nothing either way. For out-of-state vendors, the working substitute is: their home-state credential on file, §300.403 evidence on file, and Texas-compliant COAs lot by lot. If a vendor can't produce those, that's your answer. The shipment itself: invoice, lots, and the COA check. Chapter 300 doesn't prescribe an invoice or manifest format for retail deliveries — the receiving-record duties written into the rule (§300.203(d)(3), §300.406(c)) are manufacturing-side. So treat this as operating discipline, not rule text: reconcile the physical delivery against the invoice or packing list, and make sure every line item resolves to a lot number you can find on the physical product. A delivery you can't tie to lots is a delivery you can't tie to COAs. Then run the COA Intake Checklist — the job aid built from the Understanding COAs lesson — for every lot in the delivery, one lot at a time, because a COA belongs to one lot. In brief: Stage 1, the document is complete and valid (the 12 required elements of §300.301(d), including the expiration date — expired COAs are not valid, and products with expired COAs must be retested, §300.301(f)); Stage 2, the identity matches — product name, matrix type, lot number, and manufacturer name and address on the COA match the physical product, and the QR code actually resolves to this COA at the laboratory; Stage 3, the numbers clear — all requested analyses reported, total delta-9 THC reviewed with the laboratory's measurement of uncertainty under the applicable compliance process, contaminant panels present and passing; Stage 4, file it where you can retrieve it by lot number and put the expiration date on your calendar. Test results you rely on are also a retention item: test results must be retained for at least three years from the date results are received (§300.303(f)), and records described in the chapter generally carry a three-year minimum (§300.203(c)). Filing the COA at intake is what makes that possible later. The label and the packaging, at the back door. The product-labels lesson covers the label in full; at receiving you spot-check it. Every unit intended for individual retail sale must carry, on its outer packaging, the required label elements: batch (lot) number, batch date, product name, manufacturer or processor name, their telephone number and email address, the COA URL, and recommended serving size in milligrams with servings per container (25 TAC §300.402(a)); the statute adds a certification that delta-9 THC is not more than 0.3 percent (HSC §443.205(a)(6)). The five required warnings must be present (§300.402(b)), and the COA URL must be conspicuously marked and reach the COA in three or fewer steps (§300.402(a)(6)(A)–(B)) — try it on one unit per lot. And the label's lot number must match the COA you just checked: label ↔ COA consistency is the whole point of doing these together. Packaging is a duty that sits squarely on the retailer: before sale or distribution, the product must be prepackaged — or placed at the time of sale — in packaging that is tamper-evident, child resistant, and resealable if multi-serving, while keeping the child-resistant mechanism intact (§300.405). If a delivery arrives in packaging that doesn't meet that standard and isn't something you repackage compliantly at sale, that's an intake problem, not a register problem. Also scan the trade dress: packaging that would likely mislead a person to believe the product contains no hemp-derived cannabinoid, or is intended for medical use, cannot be sold (§300.407). Finally, remember these products sell only to customers 21 and over (§300.701) — receiving is the moment to route them to age-restricted handling in your store, not the open floor. When something doesn't clear: reject, quarantine, document. The rule tells you what an invalid state looks like — expired COA, missing elements, nonconforming product — but it does not prescribe a retail rejection procedure. The following is HempDash operating guidance, not rule text. The decision rule comes from the intake checklist and doesn't bend: no matching, current, verifiable COA — the product doesn't go on the shelf. From there: segregate the affected lot somewhere it cannot be sold or mixed with cleared stock; tell the vendor the same day, in writing, what failed and what you need (the right COA for this lot, a corrected label, a retest); and document what you did — date, lot, what failed, who you told, and how it resolved. If the vendor can't cure it, return or refuse the delivery per your terms. Two reasons for the paper trail: DSHS's enforcement process expressly gives retailers notice and an opportunity to resolve unintentional or negligent violations (§300.606(b)), and a dated record that a lot never reached your shelf is the documentation you would bring to that process. One thing this lesson deliberately does not answer: who bears the cost of a retest when a COA has expired, and what your exposure is while you wait. The rule is silent — it's written in the passive voice. Settle it in your supplier agreements, with your attorney, before the first delivery, not during a dispute. Rule requires vs. good practice. The rule requires: your supplier side properly credentialed (CHP license to manufacture or process; wholesaler license to distribute); §300.403 evidence available on request for out-of-state product; a valid, unexpired, matching COA regime per §300.301; the label elements, warnings, and COA-link rules of §300.402 and HSC §443.205; tamper-evident, child-resistant (and where applicable resealable) packaging by the time of sale (§300.405); nothing misleading (§300.407); and no nonconforming product introduced into commerce (§300.602(1)). Good practice — not in the rule, but what keeps deliveries clean: look up new Texas suppliers on DSHS's public licensee search and file the result; collect out-of-state vendors' home-state credentials up front; reconcile every delivery to lot numbers before running COAs; spot-check one unit's label and QR link per lot; keep a written rejection log; and put COA expiration dates on a standing calendar, not a one-time check. Here is a real-world example. A Dallas retailer takes a Thursday delivery from a new vendor: four cases, three lots, an invoice that lists products but no lot numbers. The receiving clerk starts by matching cases to lots by hand and immediately finds the gap — one case's lot number appears on no COA in the vendor's email. Of the two lots with COAs, one COA expired last month; the QR code on the third lot's label resolves to the lab and matches. The clerk shelves the one clean lot, moves the other two cases to the quarantine shelf in the stockroom, and emails the vendor the same afternoon: send the COA for lot A, and a current (retested) COA for lot B, or we return both. Total time: about twenty minutes. Compare the alternative — all three lots shelved, and the gaps discovered by a DSHS sampler instead of a receiving clerk. Key takeaways. Receiving is the compliance gate: what you shelve, you introduce into commerce — and nonconforming product is prohibited (§300.602(1)). Manufacturers need a DSHS CHP license and distributors need an HSC Chapter 431 wholesaler license; DSHS publishes a free public lookup of licensees and registrants — check new Texas suppliers before the first order. For out-of-state product, the duty to produce evidence of compliant manufacture on DSHS request sits on you, the Texas seller (§300.403) — collect it at onboarding, not on demand. Run the COA Intake Checklist per lot, every delivery: complete and valid, identity matches, numbers clear, file and calendar the expiry. Spot-check labels and warnings per lot, confirm packaging meets §300.405 by the time of sale — and when anything fails: don't shelve, quarantine, notify the vendor in writing, and document it. And finally, the checklist: Receiving checklist. New Texas supplier verified on DSHS's Current Licensees and Registrants lookup; result filed in the vendor record. Distributor-type vendors: wholesaler license (HSC Ch. 431) question asked and answered in writing. Out-of-state vendors: home-state credential and §300.403 compliance evidence on file before first delivery. Delivery reconciled to invoice/packing list, and every item tied to a lot number on the physical product. COA Intake Checklist completed for each lot: complete and valid → identity matches → numbers clear → file and decide. One unit per lot: label elements and five warnings present; COA URL/QR reaches the COA in three or fewer steps; label lot = COA lot. Packaging tamper-evident and child resistant (resealable where required) as delivered, or handled compliantly at time of sale. Nothing shelved that could mislead (no-cannabinoid look or medical-use look, §300.407); age-restricted placement applied. Anything that fails: quarantined away from sellable stock, vendor notified in writing same day, rejection log updated. COA expiration dates added to the standing expiry calendar; COAs filed retrievable by lot number. You've completed this HempDash Academy lesson. Test what you learned below, or see how HempDash can help put it into practice. This recording is educational information, not legal advice — rules change, so verify current requirements with DSHS and your attorney.

Stay current

Get an email alert when Texas or federal hemp regulations change, or when this guide is updated.

Receiving is where compliance is decided

Almost every retail compliance duty in this course — valid COA, compliant label, child-resistant packaging, nothing misleading, nothing nonconforming — is easiest to satisfy at one moment: when the box arrives and before anything is shelved. Once a product is on the shelf, you are selling it; and Texas law prohibits 'introducing hemp-derived cannabinoids into commerce that do not conform to the provisions of this chapter' — and prohibits causing that, too (25 TAC §300.602(1)).

This lesson turns the rules you've already learned into a receiving routine. It works down the same stages as the COA Intake Checklist — document intake, identity matching, results review, file and decide — and adds the receiving-specific layer around it: is this vendor legitimate, is the shipment what the invoice says, and what do you do when something doesn't clear?

Before the first order: know who you're buying from

Texas splits the supply chain into credentials. A person must hold a consumable hemp products license issued by DSHS before manufacturing or processing consumable hemp products, and must hold a wholesaler license under Health and Safety Code Chapter 431 before distributing them (25 TAC §300.201(a)). A 'distributor' — someone who distributes consumable hemp products for resale — is expressly required to hold that wholesaler license (§300.101(16)). And one structural detail worth knowing: manufacturers may only distribute products they manufactured (§300.101(24)) — so a 'vendor' offering you five other brands alongside their own may be acting as a distributor, and the wholesaler-license question applies.

Here's the honest part: we found no provision in Chapter 300 that requires a retailer to verify a supplier's license before buying. The supplier-documentation record duties in the rule (§300.203(d)(3)) sit on manufacturers and processors, not on you. But 'not required to check' is not the same as 'safe not to check' — if nonconforming product crosses your counter, §300.602(1) and the detention, embargo, and destruction machinery (§§300.603–300.604) land on the product in your store, and the cost and disruption land on you.

The check is cheap, because DSHS makes it public. The Consumable Hemp Program's 'Current Licensees and Registrants' page publishes downloadable lists of Consumable Hemp Product licensees and Retail Hemp Registrations, plus an online search tool: 'Verify that an establishment has a current license or registration with DSHS. Search by name, license type, city or county.' No login is needed. Before onboarding a Texas manufacturer, look them up; keep a dated screenshot or the row from the list in your vendor file. If a Texas manufacturer isn't on DSHS's list, ask them why before you buy — don't assume the list is stale in their favor.

Out-of-state product: the rule, and its limits

Out-of-state product is legal to sell in Texas — with strings. A person selling consumable hemp products in Texas that were processed or manufactured outside Texas must comply with Chapter 300, and must, on DSHS's request, submit evidence that the products were manufactured in another state or foreign jurisdiction in compliance with a USDA-approved plan, the USDA plan under 7 U.S.C. §1639q, or (for foreign products) laws plus Texas-compliant testing (25 TAC §300.403). Read that carefully: the duty to produce that evidence sits on the person selling in Texas — you. At receiving, that means asking the out-of-state vendor for their state license or plan documentation up front, because DSHS asks you, not them.

A related transport rule: substances with total delta-9 THC above the acceptable hemp THC level may not be transported into Texas for further processing (§300.404). That provision is aimed at processing inputs rather than retail stock, but it's part of why an over-threshold COA on an inbound shipment is a full stop, not a judgment call.

Where the rules go quiet, stay closed. One piece has since been answered in agency guidance: DSHS now states a Retail Hemp Registration is required for sellers who retail consumable hemp products online without a storefront. Chapter 300 still doesn't clearly address out-of-state sellers shipping into Texas or online marketplaces, and an out-of-state vendor won't appear on DSHS's Texas licensee list — that absence proves nothing either way. For out-of-state vendors, the working substitute is: their home-state credential on file, §300.403 evidence on file, and Texas-compliant COAs lot by lot. If a vendor can't produce those, that's your answer.

The shipment itself: invoice, lots, and the COA check

Chapter 300 doesn't prescribe an invoice or manifest format for retail deliveries — the receiving-record duties written into the rule (§300.203(d)(3), §300.406(c)) are manufacturing-side. So treat this as operating discipline, not rule text: reconcile the physical delivery against the invoice or packing list, and make sure every line item resolves to a lot number you can find on the physical product. A delivery you can't tie to lots is a delivery you can't tie to COAs.

Then run the COA Intake Checklist — the job aid built from the Understanding COAs lesson — for every lot in the delivery, one lot at a time, because a COA belongs to one lot. In brief: Stage 1, the document is complete and valid (the 12 required elements of §300.301(d), including the expiration date — expired COAs are not valid, and products with expired COAs must be retested, §300.301(f)); Stage 2, the identity matches — product name, matrix type, lot number, and manufacturer name and address on the COA match the physical product, and the QR code actually resolves to this COA at the laboratory; Stage 3, the numbers clear — all requested analyses reported, total delta-9 THC reviewed with the laboratory's measurement of uncertainty under the applicable compliance process, contaminant panels present and passing; Stage 4, file it where you can retrieve it by lot number and put the expiration date on your calendar.

Test results you rely on are also a retention item: test results must be retained for at least three years from the date results are received (§300.303(f)), and records described in the chapter generally carry a three-year minimum (§300.203(c)). Filing the COA at intake is what makes that possible later.

The label and the packaging, at the back door

The product-labels lesson covers the label in full; at receiving you spot-check it. Every unit intended for individual retail sale must carry, on its outer packaging, the required label elements: batch (lot) number, batch date, product name, manufacturer or processor name, their telephone number and email address, the COA URL, and recommended serving size in milligrams with servings per container (25 TAC §300.402(a)); the statute adds a certification that delta-9 THC is not more than 0.3 percent (HSC §443.205(a)(6)). The five required warnings must be present (§300.402(b)), and the COA URL must be conspicuously marked and reach the COA in three or fewer steps (§300.402(a)(6)(A)–(B)) — try it on one unit per lot. And the label's lot number must match the COA you just checked: label ↔ COA consistency is the whole point of doing these together.

Packaging is a duty that sits squarely on the retailer: before sale or distribution, the product must be prepackaged — or placed at the time of sale — in packaging that is tamper-evident, child resistant, and resealable if multi-serving, while keeping the child-resistant mechanism intact (§300.405). If a delivery arrives in packaging that doesn't meet that standard and isn't something you repackage compliantly at sale, that's an intake problem, not a register problem. Also scan the trade dress: packaging that would likely mislead a person to believe the product contains no hemp-derived cannabinoid, or is intended for medical use, cannot be sold (§300.407). Finally, remember these products sell only to customers 21 and over (§300.701) — receiving is the moment to route them to age-restricted handling in your store, not the open floor.

When something doesn't clear: reject, quarantine, document

The rule tells you what an invalid state looks like — expired COA, missing elements, nonconforming product — but it does not prescribe a retail rejection procedure. The following is HempDash operating guidance, not rule text.

The decision rule comes from the intake checklist and doesn't bend: no matching, current, verifiable COA — the product doesn't go on the shelf. From there: segregate the affected lot somewhere it cannot be sold or mixed with cleared stock; tell the vendor the same day, in writing, what failed and what you need (the right COA for this lot, a corrected label, a retest); and document what you did — date, lot, what failed, who you told, and how it resolved. If the vendor can't cure it, return or refuse the delivery per your terms. Two reasons for the paper trail: DSHS's enforcement process expressly gives retailers notice and an opportunity to resolve unintentional or negligent violations (§300.606(b)), and a dated record that a lot never reached your shelf is the documentation you would bring to that process.

One thing this lesson deliberately does not answer: who bears the cost of a retest when a COA has expired, and what your exposure is while you wait. The rule is silent — it's written in the passive voice. Settle it in your supplier agreements, with your attorney, before the first delivery, not during a dispute.

Rule requires vs. good practice

The rule requires: your supplier side properly credentialed (CHP license to manufacture or process; wholesaler license to distribute); §300.403 evidence available on request for out-of-state product; a valid, unexpired, matching COA regime per §300.301; the label elements, warnings, and COA-link rules of §300.402 and HSC §443.205; tamper-evident, child-resistant (and where applicable resealable) packaging by the time of sale (§300.405); nothing misleading (§300.407); and no nonconforming product introduced into commerce (§300.602(1)).

Good practice — not in the rule, but what keeps deliveries clean: look up new Texas suppliers on DSHS's public licensee search and file the result; collect out-of-state vendors' home-state credentials up front; reconcile every delivery to lot numbers before running COAs; spot-check one unit's label and QR link per lot; keep a written rejection log; and put COA expiration dates on a standing calendar, not a one-time check.

Real-world example

A Dallas retailer takes a Thursday delivery from a new vendor: four cases, three lots, an invoice that lists products but no lot numbers. The receiving clerk starts by matching cases to lots by hand and immediately finds the gap — one case's lot number appears on no COA in the vendor's email. Of the two lots with COAs, one COA expired last month; the QR code on the third lot's label resolves to the lab and matches. The clerk shelves the one clean lot, moves the other two cases to the quarantine shelf in the stockroom, and emails the vendor the same afternoon: send the COA for lot A, and a current (retested) COA for lot B, or we return both.

Total time: about twenty minutes. Compare the alternative — all three lots shelved, and the gaps discovered by a DSHS sampler instead of a receiving clerk.

Key takeaways

  • Receiving is the compliance gate: what you shelve, you introduce into commerce — and nonconforming product is prohibited (§300.602(1)).
  • Manufacturers need a DSHS CHP license and distributors need an HSC Chapter 431 wholesaler license; DSHS publishes a free public lookup of licensees and registrants — check new Texas suppliers before the first order.
  • For out-of-state product, the duty to produce evidence of compliant manufacture on DSHS request sits on you, the Texas seller (§300.403) — collect it at onboarding, not on demand.
  • Run the COA Intake Checklist per lot, every delivery: complete and valid, identity matches, numbers clear, file and calendar the expiry.
  • Spot-check labels and warnings per lot, confirm packaging meets §300.405 by the time of sale — and when anything fails: don't shelve, quarantine, notify the vendor in writing, and document it.

Receiving checklist

  • New Texas supplier verified on DSHS's Current Licensees and Registrants lookup; result filed in the vendor record
  • Distributor-type vendors: wholesaler license (HSC Ch. 431) question asked and answered in writing
  • Out-of-state vendors: home-state credential and §300.403 compliance evidence on file before first delivery
  • Delivery reconciled to invoice/packing list, and every item tied to a lot number on the physical product
  • COA Intake Checklist completed for each lot: complete and valid → identity matches → numbers clear → file and decide
  • One unit per lot: label elements and five warnings present; COA URL/QR reaches the COA in three or fewer steps; label lot = COA lot
  • Packaging tamper-evident and child resistant (resealable where required) as delivered, or handled compliantly at time of sale
  • Nothing shelved that could mislead (no-cannabinoid look or medical-use look, §300.407); age-restricted placement applied
  • Anything that fails: quarantined away from sellable stock, vendor notified in writing same day, rejection log updated
  • COA expiration dates added to the standing expiry calendar; COAs filed retrievable by lot number

Check your understanding

  1. 1. Which credential must a Texas consumable hemp manufacturer hold before manufacturing or processing products?

  2. 2. How can a retailer check whether a Texas supplier actually holds a DSHS license or registration?

  3. 3. A shipment arrives from an out-of-state manufacturer. Who must be able to produce evidence of compliant out-of-state manufacture if DSHS asks?

  4. 4. During receiving you find a lot whose COA expired last month. What does the rule say about that COA?

  5. 5. A delivered product's pouch is neither tamper-evident nor child resistant. What's the retailer's duty?

Review COAs with more confidence

HempDash extracts key fields from uploaded COAs and links each document to its lot, giving your team a structured way to review completeness, reported test results, and expiration information during intake before a product is shelved.

Book a Demo →